English home · Legal topics · Contact · Deutsch
An unjustified warning and an abusive enforcement strategy are different matters. An unfounded allegation does not by itself establish abuse.
What we examine
- Examine standing, the alleged infringement and formal requirements.
- Assess concrete indicators of abuse in their overall context.
- Identify any available counterclaims under the relevant legal framework.
Key legal considerations
The number of warnings alone is not a reliable test. Unfair competition and copyright law contain specific rules on reimbursement of defence costs. Unjustified IP warnings may raise additional claims. Sending a counter-warning is not automatically appropriate.
Illustrative practical example
A business challenges a demand that lacks a sustainable basis and separately examines whether the statutory conditions for recovering its necessary defence costs are met.
Documents for the review
The warning, correspondence, previous declarations, court papers, supporting records and a chronology.
Advice and next steps
horak. advises businesses, self-employed professionals and organisations on defending and enforcing claims. We discuss the facts, options, deadlines and fee basis with you. Our head office is in Hannover and we advise clients throughout Germany.
First steps · Undertakings · Court proceedings
Legal source: Official legislation. The assessment depends on the individual case.
Send us your enquiry
Tell us briefly what happened and include any deadline or date of service. All fields are optional. Please provide an email address or telephone number if you would like a reply. Sending an enquiry does not by itself establish a client relationship or confirm that we will handle a deadline. For urgent matters, please also call +49 511 357 356-0.
Thank you for your response. ✨
Information about the processing of your enquiry and your rights is provided in our privacy notice (German). You can also contact us at info@abmahnungsrechte.de.